Thursday, August 05, 2010

The Fight Is Still On Against Abortions in the Military

As a future Navy physician (and current Navy officer) I am appalled that Senator Burris would try and force the military to provide abortions.  Despite what the media would have you believe most Americans are against abortion, and that goes for military members as well.  This is an all out assault on the unborn.  We have attacks coming through Obamacare, stem-cell research, govt funding to Planned Parenthood, and now the attempts to force it upon the military.

Abortion and the military is an interesting situation, but one that reflects the greater society.  The so-called need for abortion in the military arises primarily because if a woman becomes pregnant, her ability for advancement disappears.  If she is overseas, she will quickly be sent home and her career will stall out.  (Read more in a June 2010 NY Times article about this).  So in the eyes of the liberals, the answer is to allow these women to abort their children rather than to call upon them, and the men involved, to exhibit the self discipline we would expect from our service men and women.

We ought to be focusing on to points in all of this.  The first is the need to instil the idea of the dignity of human life.  It would seem this would be very challenging in light of the profession of a service member, but it is necessary even in light of this. We need our service men and women to recognize the idea of self defense, but also the idea of mercy when encountering the enemy.  The same for the unborn.  We must show them that this is a life that they have taken an oath to protect, just as they are protecting the rest of us.   The second point is self discipline.  A standard of self control and chastity should be instilled in these men and women (just like the rest of America needs it).  If any group of people should be able to do this, it should be those who have dedicated their lives to the idea of discipline and sacrifice.

So we need to continue the fight against this Amendment:

Over 200 Military Physicians Petition for No Abortion on Military Bases
WASHINGTON, DC, August 3, 2010 ( -- Over 200 active and retired military physicians have signed a letterorganized by the 16,000-member Christian Medical Association (CMA), in which they ask Senators to vote against the FY 2011 National Defense Authorization Act, unless an amendment permitting abortions to be performed on military bases is stripped from the bill.
"In addition to facilitating further destruction of unborn life, the provision will place military physicians with life-honoring convictions in the unenviable position of either disobeying orders, abandoning their conscience, or seeking objector status," said CMA Senior Vice President Gene Rudd, MD, who has received the Gorgas Award for distinguished service in the American military. 
Current law prohibits the performance of abortion by Department of Defense (DoD) medical personnel or using DoD medical facilities, except in case of rape, incest, and a threat to the life of the mother.  An amendment added to the Defense Authorization Act by the outgoing Senator Roland Burris (D-IL), however, would permit abortion on both domestic and overseas military bases.

"Such a drastic and controversial change in longstanding federal policy could disrupt military medicine in a time of war and also undermine military physician retention and recruitment," the letter says.
When President Clinton instituted a policy in 1993 permitting abortions on military bases, most military physicians refused to participate in them.  The letter warns that the efforts of those holding to "partisan abortion ideology" in attempting to diminish conscience rights, combined with pro-abortion policies such as the Burris amendment, could "drastically reduce the number of physicians, thus reducing patient access."
"Reducing physicians and patient access during two wars and at a time of a growing and severe national shortage of physicians - especially in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine - is hardly wise policy, regardless of one's views on abortion, " the letter states.
Abortion has been prohibited on military bases since a 1996 law overturned Clinton's policy.  That law "has enabled military physicians to practice medicine according to the life-honoring principles expressed in the Hippocratic oath and Judeo-Christian ethics," according to the letter.
CMA Director of Global Health Outreach Col. Donald Thompson, MD, who recently retired from the Air Force, said that "this provision would put conscientious military medics on the losing side of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) in key areas crucial to good order and discipline in the military.”
"Our military exists to fight our nation's wars, not to be a ideological playground. If this provision stays in the NDAA, it will drive out of the military those who are most likely to serve their nation by going in harm's way."
The FY 2011 Defense Authorization act would also end the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," (DADT) policy and permit homosexuals to serve openly in the military.
You may find contact information for your Senator here.

See related stories on

U.S. Senate Committee Oks Amendment Ditching Military Abortion Ban

Rep. Smith Vows to Oppose Military Abortions in Defense Bill

Missouri Shows Washington the Opinion of the People on Obamacare

From the NY Times:

Voters in Missouri Oppose Health Law
Published: August 4, 2010
Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a measure intended to nullify the new federal health care law, becoming the first state in the nation where ordinary people made known their dismay over the issue at the ballot box.
The measure was meant to invalidate a crucial element of President Obama’s health care law — namely, that most people be required to gethealth insurance or pay a tax penalty. Supporters of the measure said it would send a firm signal to Washington about how this state, often a bellwether in presidential elections, felt.
The referendum drew support from 71 percent of nearly 939,000 voters. “My constituents told me they felt like their voices had been ignored and they wanted Washington to hear them,” said Jane Cunningham, a state senator and Republican. “It looks to me like they just picked up a megaphone.”
The referendum, known as Proposition C, was seen as a first look at efforts by conservatives to gather and rally their forces over the issue. Practically speaking, it remains entirely uncertain what effect the vote will have. The insurance requirement of the federal health care law does not come into effect until 2014. By then, experts say, the courts are likely to weigh in on the provision.

Though this vote is mainly symbolic at this point in time, I hope that it does show Washington that the majority of Americans do not want Obamacare.  It is a poorly thought out system that is going to ruin health care in this country.  Let us continue to pray that our elected leaders will actually listen to our voices.